The Divergence of U.S. and UK Takeover Regulation Essay

The Divergence of U.S. and UK Takeover Regulation - Essay Example In the article, there is a big difference in takeover regulation of companies in UK and US. The law of Delaware in the United States provides a peaceful condition in which the ruling board is given the mandate in the decision making of the type of tender to be issued. On the other side, United Kingdom uses a defensive tactic by targeting the ruling board. This tactic prohibits the management from interacting with other management in a peaceful manner. However, during the takeover regulation in the US, the court usually decides over tender and offers the rules concerning it. On the contrary, UK lawyers disappears when the hostile bidders launches their bids. By the use of this tactic, the UK were able to private their regime through the institutional inventors of which their counterparts could not. Though both the American and English system of corporate governance has different features, they share ownership. The hostile tactic of takeover gives priority to function as a disciplinary instrument undertaken by the management. Nevertheless, both possess different rules and regulations governing the takeover battle. Finally, the difference in approach between US and UK is relevant as it provides education leading to enhancement of the economy of the entire

Report Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2

Report - Essay Example A couple of mails recently received from the customers read that they are highly unsatisfied with our contact services. Some of them have complained in very harsh words that their calls were not picked. The problem is reported to have persisted 24 hours and they were never replied. Due to the malfunction of the helpline, many customers have incurred exaggerated telephone bills. Some of them have even personally visited the office and complained about the same quite rudely. This has upset the whole administration. â€Å"big screen† mobiles and many have related it to the unusual design of the sets. One of the customers has mentioned that all purchasers of this particular model have found same deficiency in the performance of this mobile. He wants the company to return his money in place of the mobile. prolonged use of mobiles that has exposed their ears to microwave radiations. Customers who have experienced headache after prolonged usage of the mobiles asked for modification in the design of the mobiles that would reduce ears’ exposure to microwave radiations. maintain the company’s reputation. Instant replacement of helpline with an efficient system is advised. Customers have strongly recommended that the company should seriously think over the development of a 24 hour live chat system in which customers can address their issues without having to make expensive calls to the administration. design of the mobile does not allow the use of suitable battery. It is strongly recommended to reconsider the design of the mobile to eliminate this issue. The director is advised to forward his immediate response to the customers’ queries about the mobile return and payback, since the mobiles were initially issued without a payback guarantee. The above mentioned issues have had considerable adverse effects on the affection of the customers with our